It was with total amazement, shock and horror that I read the last line of this report in the BBC about the impact of India's first round exit from the World Cup.
Sony's Kunal Dasgupta now says the format of the tournament is flawed.
"In a 48-day tournament, if teams like India and Pakistan are out for playing bad cricket in two matches, there is something really wrong. We were against this format and even told the International Cricket Council to reconsider it," he said.
It's been pretty obvious for a while that television runs most things in cricket, including scheduling. It is perhaps time to congratulate the ICC for sticking to their schedule instead of kowtowing to the demands of sponsors, rights owners, etc.
There is nothing wrong with the fact that the first round has only 3 games per team. India and Pakistan are out because their opponents played better. Apparently the ICC had framed up this schedule after getting feedback from players and boards that the previous World Cup, which had two groups of six teams each, had the potential to have too many games involving minnow teams.
I'm of the opinion that weaker teams should play in the World Cup, but they should also get enough games against stronger opposition in the year leading up to the World Cup. At the same time, we ought to ensure that the World Cup isn't a tournament where around 50% of the teams have absolutely no chance of getting anywhere near the knock-out stage.
My solution, for the 2011 World Cup in the Indian sub-continent is to merge the schedule of the 2003 World Cup (Super Six stage), the 2006 ICC Champions Trophy (having a qualification round) and the current one (a round-robin in the second stage).
The top 8 from the 11 ODI playing nations don't have to go through a qualification round. The qualifiers from the ICC Trophy (only the finalists) play against the 3 ODI playing nations who didn't make it to the main draw. So that means 5 teams in the qualifier round. Play a round-robin (10 games) and the top two teams make it to the main draw.
The main draw would have a total of 10 teams, split into 2 groups of 5 teams each. They play a round-robin and the format becomes similar to the 2003 World Cup Super Six stage (six teams qualify - now 3 from each group, teams carrying over points against the other team which qualified, play against the other 4 teams which qualified etc.). Then the top 4 get to the semis and the winners of the semis play in the final. This'd mean a total of 32 games (20 in the first round, 9 in the second, 2 semi finals and 1 final). Even if we include the 10 qualifier round games, that's a total of 42 games. Compare this to the current tournament - 51 games in all, 24 of them in the first round and an equal number in the second round.
In terms of number of days the tournament would run, that'd obviously reduce too. The 2007 World Cup goes on for around 45 days. This could be significantly reduced to around a month (two first round games per day - 10 days of playing time, 9 days for the second round, 3 for the knock out games). Add in reserve days for all games and two rest days per team and we'd be looking at around 30-odd days. I don't have those details worked out though.
- 461 reads
Sun, 01/04/2007 - 1:25am
I'm clearly a radical thinker. They don't think that they should be judged on 3 games in a few days. I think if you can't perform in 3 games in a few days against different teams (come on, we've had ODI series of two matches...that's laughable) then you don't deserve to go on to the next round. If we couldn't beat enough teams then we wouldn't've deserved to advance either. And if we don't make it to the semi finals then...that's life. We didn't play as we should have and others played better. I'll be sad, depressed, angry but...
(I didn't get off my lazy self to post this on my own blog...hehehe.)
I mean, everybody thinks Australia is super strong. Everybody is probably sure they're going to win. But we didn't just give declare them World Cup winners. We're still making them play all the matches against everybody.
And I for one prefer to see Bangladesh vs Ireland than India vs Pakistan. BTDT. If they're really dying for an India vs Pakistan match...well neither of those teams are playing now...arrange one!
Don't they want the game to expand to more countries? What will we do then? Everybody plays everybody? Can you imagine that happening in World Cup Football? Chaos. You just *have* to perform.
I'm not sure what I think of your proposal. But I'd love if teams who think they have a God-given right to play in World Cup didn't qualify. (Yes, I know this could no doubt affect West Indies too...but hey...I'm not against earning a position.)
Lily, West Indian
Post new comment